Search Topic In This Blog

Sunday, August 29, 2010

The Manila Hostage Crisis - What went wrong?

The Manila hostage crisis occurred when a dismissed Philippine National Police officer took over a tour bus in Rizal Park, Manila, Philippines on August 23, 2010. Disgruntled former senior inspector (equivalent military rank: captain) Rolando Mendoza, from the Manila Police District (MPD) hijacked a tour bus carrying 25 tourists from Hong Kong in an attempt to get his job back.[3] He said that he was summarily dismissed without the opportunity to properly defend himself, and that all he wanted was a fair hearing.[4]As a result of the ten-hour siege, the ensuing shoot-out, and a botched rescue attempt by MPD watched by millions on live television news, eight of the hostages and Mendoza died and nine other people were injured. The Hong Kong Government then immediately issued a top-level 'black' travel alert for the Philippines.[5]

Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manila_hostage_crisis


What Went Wrong?

THE TRAINING

Hostage situation may happen anytime and at anywhere. In dealing with, a Standard Procedure must and is a MUST to follow and a training must be carried out.

This is just a training, but it handles the situation. See the videos below:



In a minute, the assault is done and accomplished. but, on the day that a real situation was to be carried out... a real crisis happened.

The video below shows how they executed the plan, but later on it fails.



Full Coverage of the Hostage Siege: http://www.pinoytambayan.tv/2010/08/24-oras-08232010.html

Some reasons into why the MPD SWAT had failed in their assault:

#1. MPD SWAT doesn't anticipated the actual condition of the bus. In their pre-assault practice it is done in broad daylight and the bus being used in pre-assault doesn't have window curtains in which they can easily locate and see the suspect. And lastly, the bus door is already open before they assault the bus.



In the actual video footage of the hostage siege, we could see that every window of the bus is covered with window curtains, the bus front and rear door are all closed, and the assault is done at night where there is no visibility of the hostages and the hostage taker inside the bus. They keep on hammering the front door, winshield and windows for over half an hour.

#2. The MPD SWAT assaulted without proper tools for breaching the bus. Some tools and equipment that is really important and a must have for a assaulting team:

How I wished they were and will be provided with all the necessary tools and equipments.

Corner Shot -
with attached small camera in-front, a flashlight, and folded into a corner or blind sight of the target. Developed by Israel.




A Ladder, Breaching and Impact Tools, and Puller





Portable & Flexible Hole Camera


Flash Bang and Smoke Gas.





Kevlar, Helmet, Goggles & Gas Mask



Night Vision Device


Infrared Scope for Snipers.


#3. Video footage shows that, no coordination among the assault team on how and where they get in to the bus. Video shows that they are scattering around the bus trying to figure out what be the next move to execute. Expert says that when a flash bang or smoke gas is thrown, that signals the assault or breaching entry no matter what happend next. In the video, for how many times they thrown a tear gas, smoke gas, and a flash bang but none immediate movement from the assault team. Some failed to thrown it on the window hole where it bounce back to the assault team, then a second tries but still it fails. A funny thing to watch but it gives us an idea how important to include in their training the throwing or tossing of nades, gas, and/or a flash bang. I remember a one game that I played before, the Call of Duty II, before a soldier is set into a war, the soldier must undergo a brief training of handling a gun, sniping and including how to close attack an enemy. And the last part of the training is the throwing and tossing of potatoes (as a Grenade) into the building window and into the door. And when the soldier passed the training, he's set for the war.

Call of Duty 2, Throwing Potatoes (as Grenades)


#4. The live and continued coverage of the hostage siege shows the assault and the movement of the MPD SWAT from the outside. Report says, the bus is equipped with a TV and the blow-by-blow accounts of the broadcast media enabled Mendoza to monitor the sensitive police actions aimed at ending the standoff. “He was able to monitor our moves from the TV installed on the bus. Some of the radio reports even revealed the positions of our snipers. It really made our task more difficult,” the unidentified officer added.

The Hostage Crisis turns into a Hostage Critics, more says due to inadequate of training, lack of tools and equipment for the SWAT team. Other reasons came out after the initial investigation and review of the video footages.

What went wrong and who is to blame with, the tragedy shows an important thing, a view on how to deal with in such a kind of situation. As President Nonoy Aquino says "May mga pagkukulang. May mga magbabayad (There were lapses. Some people will pay),"

Hollywood actor and martial arts expert, Jackie Chan said in his Twitter account, that Hong Kong is built by many people. He also said" If they killed the guy sooner, they will say why not negotiate first? If they negotiate first, they ask why not kill the guy sooner? So sad."


Some videos that I personally collected to the internet that shows special course and training in handling hostage situation.









And this is the Philippine National Police Special Training in Time Crisis and Dota Course
...

http://www.palpak.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Time-Crisis-Police-Stimulation.jpg



... a computerized assault. Nice one Sir!


Related Issue:


British expert tells how hostages should have been rescued

More lapses in hostage crisis cited

Forensic expert sees more Manila police lapses

Grief, dismay over Manila hostage crisis

Police failed to bring gas masks—official

AFP elite team offered for hostage crisis but never used -- spokesman


Hong Kong criticizes handling of Manila hostage crisis

Search on for 'Facebook cops' who posed in front of hijacked bus



Thanks for reading my article.

- ACJ 247

Ganito ba dapat ang ipakita nating mga Pinoy?

Sariwa pa sa alaala ng karamihan lalo na sa mga pamilya ng nadamay at namatayang Hongkong Nationals ang nangyari at madugong Manila Bus Hostage (August 23, 2010 @ Quirino Grandstand). Sa mga larawang nagkalat sa internet, isang pang-iinsulto di lamang sa mga nadamay at nawalan ng mga mahal sa buhay, ito ay pang-iinsulto na rin sa ating Pangulo na kung saan ay kaniya mismong pinahayag at ipinaki-usap sa mamayang Pilipino at sa buong mundo na huwag nating gawing sentro ng issue o i-trivialize ang nangyaring hostage crisis.

Pero, ano itong mga larawang kumakalat sa internet at tama bang gawin ito?...







Hmmm, piyesta sa Qurino Grandstand... PINOY talaga kahit kelan! Oiissstttt!!! grabe mo naman pulis ka pang maturingan at ikaw pa ang pasimuno sa piyestahan at kodakan. Sinundan pa ng mga istudyanteng de-moralidad na maturingan. Ala nagawa pang tumawa at ngumiti... iyan ba ang dapat ipakita sa buong mundo! To be proud sa nangyari? Ala insulto to the max, galit na nga ang ibang lahi, nagluluksa na ang mga nawalan ng minamahal sa buhay... at kayo naman ay todo enjoy sa kodakan! Ang pakiki-bahagi at pakikiramay ay hinde dapat sa ganitong paraan maipakita. KABAYAN konting disiplina naman pairalin natin at tunay na pakiki-bahagi at pakikiramay ang dapat ipakita at iparamdam.


Thanks for reading my article.


Related Issue:

Search on for 'Facebook cops' who posed in front of hijacked bus



Sunday, August 22, 2010

Yamashita's Gold

Posted by all-things-adventure.net

General Yamashita
General Tomoyuki Yamashita

It is often said that behind every great fortune lies a great crime. The twisted tale of Yamashita's gold, allegedly buried in the Philippine islands, is a story of a great fortune and many crimes that became inseparably intertwined.

The tale begins with Japan's plundering of its neighbors before and during World War II. As the Germans did in Europe, the Japanese squeezed vast fortunes from their Asian domain, creating a river of riches flowing toward the homeland. The Japanese government intended that loot pilfered from Southeast Asia would finance their war effort.

This was not the haphazard looting of a rampaging army - it was a highly organized effort - perpetrated on a massive scale by some of Japans most prominent citizens; allegedly including Emperor Hirohito and yakuza gangsters such as Yoshio Kodama.

Emperor Hirohito appointed his brother, Prince Yasuhito Chichibu, to head a secret organization called Kin no yuri ("Golden Lily"), to organize the looting.

Golden Lily teams systematically emptied treasuries, banks, factories, private homes, temples, churches, mosques, museums pawn shops and art galleries, and stripped ordinary people of what little they had, while Japan's top gangsters looted Asia's underworld and its black economy. The stolen property reportedly included gems, golden Buddhas, coins, and precious metals of immense value.

The Treasure Route

Not since the Spanish conquered the Incan Empire in 1532 had the world seen such an aggressive looting campaign. This sort of enterprise took careful planning and an established network to transport the loot safely and efficiently back to the Japanese homeland. The hub of the Golden Lilly's looting network was the Philippine island of Luzon - it's strategic location and proximity to Japan made it a natural and necessary transshipment point.

Japaneese Looting Route during world war two
Golden Lilly's looting network

During the early days of the war the looting network functioned as planned - treasures from all over South East Asia arrived in the Philippines daily - the loot was then transferred to freighters for the trip back to Japan.

But toward the end of World War II. The Allies were gaining control of the Pacific, making it increasingly difficult for the Japanese to transport the stolen treasure. Allied submarines and aircraft took a heavy toll on Japan's shipping; some of the ships carrying loot to Japan were sunk.

So, instead of shipping the treasure back to Japan, Golden Lilly operatives began hiding the loot in caves and underground complexes throughout the Philippines. The Japanese believed that when the war ended they would be able to keep the Philippine Islands as a concession for peace. They would then be able to dig up the vast wealth hidden there to rebuild their failing empire.

Arriving in the midst of this frenzied activity was the Philippines' new military governor, General Tomoyuki Yamashita, "the Tiger of Malaya" - a nickname he had won by conquering that complacent and ill-defended British colony.

As the Allied forces closed in, General Yamashita kicked the treasure concealment campaign into high gear.

Intricate tunnels

Yamashita dug massive tunels in the mountains outside Manila, some to depths of hundreds of feet, leading to the final 'storage chambers'. Many of these tunnels were excavated just below the water table during the dry season, which meant that they would eventually fill with water – a deterrent to any future salvagers. And if that were't enough, most if not all of the tunnels were booby-trapped with 1,000 and 2,000 lb bombs and poisonous gas.

Alied Prisoners were used to dig the intricate tunnelling systems and once the gold was safely stashed in the pits, the POWs were executed and buried along with the treasures. In rare cases, Japanese officers even had their own soldiers killed and buried along with the treasure, to protect the secret locations.

Yamashita also blasted caves in coral reefs, and sank entire shiploads of valuables in the sea around the islands. But in the end all this hard work was for nothing – the Americans invaded the Philippines in October 1944.

Map of Luzon Island - Philippines
Map of Luzon Island - Philippines

When the Allied forces landed on Luzon there was still much treasure remaining to be buried, so General Yamashita loaded the remaining loot on trucks and took it with him as his army retreated across the island.

Legend says that as Yamashita fled, he broke the treasure into many smaller stashes that were hidden along the line of his retreat, the bulk of the stashes are said to be concentrated in the mountainous area where Yamashita made his last stand against the invading US troops.

Yamashita eventual surrender on September 2, 1945.

According to popular lore, there are said to be 172 documented, official Japanese imperial burial sites (138 on land and 34 in deliberately scuttled ships), not to mention the numerous instances of loot buried by greedy officers and renegade soldiers. The worth of all this booty is estimated to be as much as $3 billion at 1940 rates – the equivalent of over $100 billion today. According to various post-war estimates, the gold bullion alone totals 4,000 to 6,000 tons.

Many of those who knew the locations of the loot were killed during that final battle, or were later tried by the Allies for war crimes and executed. General Tomoyuki Yamashita himself was executed for war crimes on February 23, 1946 taking the secret of his treasure to the grave.

Recovery Efforts

Many Yamashita researchers believe that a portion of the treasure has already been recovered by various parties in the sixty years since Yamashita's Execution. A great many facts have been accumulated, maps have been found, witnesses have sworn their testimonies, but the truth remains shrouded in mystery and lies. Two of the more credible and well researched rumors of recovery are listed below:

Clandestine operation

The first rumor reads like a Tom Clancy Novel. It's said that, in October 1945, American intelligence agents learned where some of the Japanese loot was hidden. Agents of the O.S.S. (forerunner of the CIA) watched as Japanese troops buried treasure on the island of Luzon and once the Japanese were defeated they began a clandestine recovery operation that lasted until 1948.

Gold Warriors Book CoverPeggy and Sterling Seagrave's book, Gold Warriors: America's Secret Recovery of Yamashita's Gold (2003), Is one of the best written on the subject and a great place to start your research on this fascinating tale. The initial edition comes with CD-ROMs containing 900 megabytes of documents, maps and photographs.

There were important reasons for all this secrecy. If the recovery of this huge mass of stolen gold became public knowledge, the countries and individuals that had been plundered could not lay claim to it; and the OSS/CIA had no intention of returning any of the plunder to its rightful owners.

Instead, they set up numerous front companies to launder the secretly recovered gold bullion. This is supposed to have become the basis of the CIA's 'off the books' operational funds during the immediate post-war years, used to create a world-wide anti-Communist network.

General William Donovan, head of the O.S.S., supposedly knew of the gold recoveries, as did General Douglas MacArthur, and former US presidents Herbert Hoover and Harry Truman.

Marcos' Gold

Perhaps the most credible rumor of recovery involves a young, up and coming Filipino politician named Ferdinand Marcos - who became successively a congressman, senator, president, and finally dictator of the Philippine islands.

Portrait of Ferdinand marcos
Ferdinand Marcos

It was rumored that Marco's rise in politics was financed in part by Yamashita's hoard. One of many stories about Marcos places him with a party of Japanese soldiers who hid gold in a tunnel at the end of the war. Then sometime in the mid 1960's he recovered $8 billion from a tunnel known as "Teresa 2", which was located 38 miles south of Manila, in the Rizal province.

An interesting fact about Marcos is that he was the leader of the Ang Maharlika guerrilla force in northern Luzon during World War II. This would have put him in the center of the action as the Japanese made their final stand against Allied forces.

Whether the dictator ever found Yamashita's gold is pure speculation - but it's a well documented fact that he searched diligently, freely using his presidential powers and the nation's armed forces in the hunt. When he declared martial law in 1972, Marcos took full advantage of the clout it conferred to step up his treasure-hunting efforts.

Marcos even tried to employ unearthly powers in the search for gold, consulting Swedish psychic Olof Jonsson, who provided tantalizing hints to the hoard's location.

In 1975, Marcos awarded himself a monopoly on underwater recovery efforts, decreeing that all future salvage operations in Philippine waters would require his personal approval.

From time to time, scraps of information leaked from the Marcos inner circle indicating that the dictator did indeed find some sort of treasure. In the 1970s, Marcos hired an American, Robert Curtis, to search for buried treasure and remelt gold bullion to hide its origins. Curtis later told of seeing bars of gold "stacked from floor to ceiling" in one of the dictator's provincial palaces. "The ingots", he said, "were of a distinctive shape used around the time of World War II".

...... Golden Buddha allegedly found by Rogelio Roxas......
The 'gold' Buddha allegedly returned to Rogelio Roxas by Ferdinand Marcos. Roxas claimed that the Buddha he had found had been solid gold with a cavity in the removable head that contained diamonds

Rogelio Roxas, a Filipino locksmith, is said to have found a one-ton, solid-gold Buddha and thousands of gold bars in a tunnel near Baguio in 1971, only to have them stolen by President Ferdinand Marcos. In 1986 Roxas sued the Marcos estate for damages, but died from poisioning on the very day he was set to testify.

In 1996, a US Federal Court in Hawaii awarded Roxas' heirs a judgment of $22 billion against the Marcos estate. This was later massively reduced on appeal.

Marcos was eventually overthrown in 1986; It was reported that when he fled the country, U.S. Customs agents discovered 24 suitcases of gold bricks and diamond jewelry hidden in diaper bags. In addition, certificates for gold bullion valued in the billions of dollars were allegedly among the personal properties he, his family, his cronies and business partners had surreptitiously taken with them when U.S. President Ronald Reagan provided them all safe passage to Hawaii.

Going for the Gold!

To this day, not one "officially accepted" Yamashita find has been documented. But despite all the disappointments and dead-ends, fortune hunters remain undaunted. Many individuals and consortia, both Filipino and foreign, continue to search for treasure sites.

Before you launch your own hunt for Yamashita's Lost Gold, here are a few things to keep in mind...

  • Danger

    Dozens have died digging up roads, riverbeds and mountainsides in a relentless pursuit of Yamashita's gold. For example, in late 2000, two men were buried alive when a tunnel collapsed near the Mindanao town of General Santos after they had dug as far as 24 feet (7.3 metres). Four others suffocated in Lumban, Laguna. And in 1998, three men were killed in Nueva Ecija in Luzon province when a tunnel they had dug caved in.

  • Con Men

    As many of these recovery projects have ended in failure, a side industry has emerged based on the fever itself. Foreign investors are often enticed into funding the digging of holes known to contain nothing. In areas of high unemployment, workers are happy to dig meaningless holes for two or three US dollars a day.

    Con men claim to have recovered treasure but will only meet with buyers in secluded rural areas – abduction points for allegedly wealthy travellers. Others will try to sell gold-plated brass Buddhas and fake gold bars for thousands of times their actual value.

    If you are tempted to take up the Yamashita challenge you might want to read this article first, which tells how a 74-year-old man lost his life savings by investing in a Yamashita scheme. Desperate race for vast riches - www.geocities.com/filipinoculture/treasure.html

  • Sharing with The Man

    The Philipine government has some pretty strict, and well enforced guidelines for would be treasure hunters operating in their territories. Many expeditions have been escorted by the Philipino Military, who stand guard night and day to make sure that the government gets their fair share of the treasure - which is listed below:

    a) For Treasure Hunting within Public Lands – Seventy-five percent(75%) to the Government and twenty-five (25%) to the Permit Holder.

    b) For Treasure Hunting in Private Lands – Thirty Percent (30%) to the Government and Seventy Percent (70%) to be shared by the Permit Holder and the landowner.

    c) For Shipwreck/Sunken Vessel Recovery – Fifty percent (50%) to the Government and Fifty percent (50%) to the Permit Holder.”
Article Link: http://all-things-adventure.net/treasure/top-10-lost-treasures/yamashitas-gold

Saturday, August 21, 2010

The Tasaday Cave People: Real or Hoax?

Posted by AllPhilippines.com
Posted on Wednesday, 11th November 2009 by All Philippines

Tasaday People Philippines

In 1971, PANAMIN or the Private Association for National Minorities, a non profit organization established by the Philippine government to protect the cultural minorities of the Philippines, headed by Filipino millionaire Manuel Elizalde Jr., discovered in the outskirts of South Cotabato in the Mindanao rainforest a tribe of indigenous people living in cave dwellings. What gave this discovery international fame, and later controversy to Elizalde and the Marcos regime, was the press release issued by PANAMIN to the media a month after their initial discovery.

According to the PANAMIN report, the newly discovered tribe people, whom they named the TASADAY, were the last remaining people on earth that lives on the Stone Age culture and lifestyle. These primitive cave dwellers, said to be living on the caverns for thousands of years, primarily eats fruits (wild yams), crabs, tadpoles, frogs, and other vegetation they can gather at the vicinity of the rainforest. Based on the report, they do not know how to cultivate land for farming or hunt for game and wild animals. The Tasadays wore leaves for their clothing and uses stone for their tools. They are also said to be peaceful loving people, they do not have words for war, enemy, or weapons.

The initial press release by Manuel Elizalde and PANAMIN on the Tasaday people made a huge buzz among the international anthropological scene. International press agencies and organizations such as the Associated Press and the National Geographic Society were strictly permitted by PANAMIN to study this primitive tribe. The 1972 National Geographic documentary entitled “The Last Tribes of Mindanao” further trusted the Tasaday discovery into the limelight. The Tasadays were very popular during this period, even famous American aviator Charles Lindbergh and Italian actress and photojournalist Gina Lollobrigida visited the Tasaday caves with the strict supervision of Elizalde and the PANAMIN group.

On April 1972, at the suggestion of Charles Lindbergh and PANAMIN, then President Ferdinand Marcos declared the 19,000 acres surrounding the Tasaday caves as the Tasaday/Manobo Blit Preserve. By 1976, President Marcos issued a Presidential decree banning all outside visitors to the Tasaday nature reserve. This move by Marcos created controversy and suspicion as by this time some media reports from both the Philippines and abroad claimed that the Tasaday discovery was just an elaborate hoax concocted by Manuel Elizalde and President Marcos himself. Subsequent independent press investigations to the Tasaday people revealed that some anthropologists who studied the Tasadays claimed that they saw some PANAMIN guards sneaking cooked rice to the cave dwellings, while another anthropologist said that he saw some Tasadays wearing modern clothings and even smoked cigarettes. The media saw the Marcos ban as a means to stop the press from revealing the real story behind the Tasaday people.

During the initial discovery by PANAMIN up to the Marcos ban, only a few anthropologists have studied the Tasaday cave people. These anthropologists were also handpicked by Mr. Elizalde himself and were only permitted to observe and study the Tasadays for a few days. They were also strictly supervised by PANAMIN staffs and agency guards. An anthropologist was booted out of the Tasaday reserve when he claimed to the press that some guards were providing food to the Tasadays.

In 1986, when the Marcos regime collapsed, Swiss journalist and anthropologist Oswald Iten visited the Tasaday caves to conduct a more thorough study to these primitive cave dwellers. He brought with him South Cotabato journalist Joey Lozano and Datu Galang Tikaw, a member of the T’Boli tribe. When they arrived at the caves, they found them to be deserted, and after further investigation on the nearby vicinity, they encountered the Tasadays, originally featured on the PANAMIN discovery, living not on caves but on huts and wooden houses, wearing jeans and t-shirts, and even smoking cigarettes. When Iten interviewed some of these so-called Tasadays, they claimed that they were never really Stone Age cave people. They only posed as primitive cave dwellers at the behest of Mr. Elizalde who promised to give them financial support and government protection if they lose all of their modern clothings and live inside the caves as a tribe of primitive cave people. They also said that before the discovery, they were farmers living on the other side of the mountain.

With the Oswald Iten discovery and revelations, the Tasadays were once again thrusted into the international limelight. Foreign press rushed to the Tasaday caves to set the facts straight once and for all. Documentaries showed during this time such as 20/20’s “The Tribe That Never Was” and “Scandal, the Lost Tribe” further claimed that the Tasaday discovery in the 70’s was a Marcos-Elizalde hoax.

Not all were lost for the Tasadays as Manuel Elizalde, through his wealth and political connections, defended his Tasaday discovery until his death in 1997. He appeared on the 1987 Philippine Congress hearings on the Tasaday controversy. He also brought some members of the Tasaday tribe to Manila to file a libel suit against some Philippine professors for claiming that the Tasadays were just an elaborate hoax. In 1988, then Philippine President Corazon Aquino made a controversial statement on the Tasaday issue when she declared a closure to the Tasaday controversy by saying that the “Tasadays are a legitimate Stone Age tribe”.

Although the power and wealth of Elizalde, as claimed by some, can influence political decisions, his influence on the scientific society, particularly the international anthropological organizations, was non existent. This gave the scientific community ample freedom to further study and reveal the truth to the Tasaday story. An American linguist professor from the University of Hawaii, Dr. Lawrence A. Reid, lived with the Tasaday people during the 1990’s to study their unique dialect. Dr. Reid stated in his report “’Linguistic Archaeology: Tracking down the Tasaday Language” that the Tasaday language is similar to the Cotabato Manobo language, a language which is not spoken at the nearby farming community, as claimed by some Tasaday, on the Iten interview, from which they originally came. Based on his studies, Dr. Reid made a final conclusion to the Tasaday controversy. He claimed that the Tasadays were once part of the Cotabato Manobo tribe and were possibly forced to relocate, possibly by tribal wars or diseases, some 150 to 200 years ago to their present cave dwellings. They are also adapted to some modern conveniences like hunting and farming tools which, suggested by the Reid report, were acquired by the Tasadays during the 1950’s from nearby tribes. Dr. Reid also concluded that the Tasaday people during the 1971 discovery were living a primitive way of life, however, they do know how to farm and hunt for food, and they also wear modern clothing as opposed to leaves.

The Stone Age culture façade created by Manuel Elizalde and the PANAMIN group for the Tasadays is now regarded today by experts as a hoax created to claim fame and credibility for Mr. Elizalde and the Marcos government. The funds collected by PANAMIN for the Tasadays and other Philippine minorities, reported to be in millions of dollars, were also looted by Manuel Elizalde, fleeing the Philippines in 1983 and lived for a while in Costa Rica.

Tasaday 1

Tasaday 2

Tasaday 3

Tasaday 4

Tasaday 5

Tasaday 6

Tasaday 7

Tasaday Food 1

Tasaday Food 2


Article Link: http://www.allphilippines.com/?p=599

Undelivered Speech of the Late Ninoy Aquino

I am prepared for the worst: Ninoy Aquino’s (undelivered) arrival statement August 21, 1983

Posted by GMANews.tv
08/21/2010 | 10:25 AM

I have returned on my free will to join the ranks of those struggling to restore our rights and freedoms through nonviolence.

I seek no confrontation. I only pray and will strive for a genuine national reconciliation founded on justice.

I am prepared for the worst, and have decided against the advice of my mother, my spiritual adviser, many of my tested friends and a few of my most valued political mentors.

A death sentence awaits me. Two more subversion charges, both calling for death penalties, have been filed since I left three years ago and are now pending with the courts.

I could have opted to seek political asylum in America, but I feel it is my duty, as it is the duty of every Filipino, to suffer with his people especially in time of crisis.

I never sought nor have I been given assurances or promise of leniency by the regime. I return voluntarily armed only with a clear conscience and fortified in the faith that in the end justice will emerge triumphant.

According to Gandhi, the WILLING sacrifice of the innocent is the most powerful answer to insolent tyranny that has yet been conceived by God and man.

Three years ago when I left for an emergency heart bypass operation, I hoped and prayed that the rights and freedoms of our people would soon be restored, that living conditions would improve and that blood-letting would stop.

Rather than move forward, we have moved backward. The killings have increased, the economy has taken a turn for the worse and the human rights situation has deteriorated.

During the martial law period, the Supreme Court heard petitions for Habeas Corpus. It is most ironic, after martial law has allegedly been lifted, that the Supreme Court last April ruled it can no longer entertain petitions for Habeas Corpus for persons detained under a Presidential Commitment Order, which covers all so-called national security cases and which under present circumstances can cover almost anything.

The country is far advanced in her times of trouble. Economic, social and political problems bedevil the Filipino. These problems may be surmounted if we are united. But we can be united only if all the rights and freedoms enjoyed before September 21, 1972 are fully restored.

The Filipino asks for nothing more, but will surely accept nothing less, than all the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the 1935 Constitution — the most sacred legacies from the Founding Fathers.

Yes, the Filipino is patient, but there is a limit to his patience. Must we wait until that patience snaps?

The nation-wide rebellion is escalating and threatens to explode into a bloody revolution. There is a growing cadre of young Filipinos who have finally come to realize that freedom is never granted, it is taken. Must we relive the agonies and the blood-letting of the past that brought forth our Republic or can we sit down as brothers and sisters and discuss our differences with reason and goodwill?

I have often wondered how many disputes could have been settled easily had the disputants only dared to define their terms.

So as to leave no room for misunderstanding, I shall define my terms:

1. Six years ago, I was sentenced to die before a firing squad by a Military Tribunal whose jurisdiction I steadfastly refused to recognize. It is now time for the regime to decide. Order my IMMEDIATE EXECUTION OR SET ME FREE.

I was sentenced to die for allegedly being the leading communist leader. I am not a communist, never was and never will be.

2. National reconciliation and unity can be achieved but only with justice, including justice for our Muslim and Ifugao brothers. There can be no deal with a Dictator. No compromise with Dictatorship.

3. In a revolution there can really be no victors, only victims. We do not have to destroy in order to build.

4. Subversion stems from economic, social and political causes and will not be solved by purely military solutions; it can be curbed not with ever increasing repression but with a more equitable distribution of wealth, more democracy and more freedom, and

5. For the economy to get going once again, the workingman must be given his just and rightful share of his labor, and to the owners and managers must be restored the hope where there is so much uncertainty if not despair.

On one of the long corridors of Harvard University are carved in granite the words of Archibald Macleish:

“How shall freedom be defended? By arms when it is attacked by arms; by truth when it is attacked by lies; by democratic faith when it is attacked by authoritarian dogma. Always, and in the final act, by determination and faith."

I return from exile and to an uncertain future with only determination and faith to offer — faith in our people and faith in God. - GMANews.TV

(Ninoy Aquino was assassinated at the Manila International Airport on August 21, 1983 before he could deliver this statement.)


Article Link: http://www.gmanews.tv/story/199074/i-am-prepared-for-the-worst-ninoy-aquinos-undelivered-arrival-statement-august-21-1983